FG - David Mark illegally acquired Senate President’s official residence
Former Senate President, David Mark, as been accused by the
Federal Government for illegally acquiring his then official residence as his
private property.
In
September this year, the government, through the Special Presidential
Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property, which is chaired by
Chief Okoi Obono-Obla, gave the former Senate President a 21-day notice to quit
the mansion.
The notice to quit, however, asked Mark to “show cause”
why the Federal Government should not “enforce the recovery of the property for
public good.”
But Mark
had quickly filed a suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja to quash all
steps taken by the panel to evict him and recover the house from him.
The case
has not been heard.
Our source, on Monday, obtained from court, copies of documents,
including exhibits, filed by the former Senate President in his suit
challenging the recovery process.
The Senate
President’s official residence is sited on 1.6 hectares of land at 1 Musa Usman
Street, (also known as No. 1 Chuba Okadigbo Street), Apo Legislative Quarters,
Gudu, Abuja.
According
to title documents, the property comprises eight structures, made up of the main
house, ADC/chief security detail’s house, guest chalet, security/generator
house, boys quarters, security post, driver/servants’ quarters and chapel.
The eight
structures are said to be properly spaced and linked with well-paved drive and
walkways and further done with lawns.
Mark, the
senator, currently representing Benue South in the National Assembly, is
accused of illegally acquiring the property with the approval of former
President Goodluck Jonathan despite that such property was excluded from the monetisation
policy of the Federal Government.
Copies of correspondences and other documents, leading to
the purchase and eventual handover of the property to Mark in April, 2011,
showed that the serving senator purchased the property at a “reserved price” of
N673,200,000.
Meanwhile,
in his letter, dated October 28, 2010, seeking the then President Jonathan’s
approval for the sale of the property, the then Minister of the Federal Capital
Territory, Mr. Bala Mohammed, had indicated that the open market value of the
property was N748,000,000.
In
addition, the then minister specifically stated that the Federal Executive
Council had, in 2004, mandated the Federal Capital Territory Administration to
sell all Federal Government’s “non-essential housing units in Abuja under
specific rules and guidelines.”
Exempted
from this arrangement are the official residences of the Senate President, the
Deputy Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the
Deputy Speaker.
He stated
that the exemption was “expressly contained in the Federal Government of
Nigeria’s Official Gazette No. 82, Vol. 92 of August 15, 2005.”
In
justifying the request for the then President’s approval for the sale, the
former minister noted that all the houses in Apo Legislative Quarters, with the
exception of the official residences of the four principal officers of the
National Assembly, had been sold to the legislators occupying them at the time
or the general public, under the Federal Government’s monetisation arrangement.
The former
minister however stated that sale of other houses in the Apo Legislative
Quarters had “altered the general security provision for the area and
extension, the security of the leading principal officers of the National
Assembly.”
The letter
added, “This lapse in the general security provision of the area led the
National Assembly to unofficially rent residential accommodation for its
leading principal officers in more secure areas within the city.”
It also
stated that due to the security concerns, the four houses of the leading
principal officers “will no longer have the status of ‘essential properties’,”
hence the FCTA “has made provision in the budget to construct residential
accommodation for the leading principal officers of the National Assembly where
the general security is befitting the status of the officers.”
The then
minister had stated that the Senate President’s residence had an open market
value of N748,000,000; the Speaker’s N670,000,000; the Deputy Senate
President’s N458,000,000; and the Deputy Speaker’s N348,500,000.
What
appeared on the then minister’s letter as Jonathan’s hand-written approval of
the request dated November 15, 2010, read, “Para 6 and 8 approved. Also see if
this could be gazetted.
“N/B:
Ensure that the new residences are ready early next year.”
By a
letter, with reference number PRES/83/FCTA/18 and dated November 18, 2010,
Jonathan conveyed his approval to the then minister’s request for the sale of
the Senate President’s official residence.
The
letter, addressed to the FCT minister and titled, ‘Re: Sale of Residential
Houses Occupied by Leading Principal Officers of the National Assembly’, was
signed by the then President’s Senior Special Assistant (Admin), Matt
Aikhionbare.
The letter
read in part, “I am directed to forward Reference A to you and to convey to
you, Mr. President’s approval of paragraphs 6 and 8 and further directive on
page 2 in line with the earlier approval of 27/06/2010.”
But by a
letter with reference number SPIP/INV/2017/VOL.1/17 and dated September 5,
2017, the Obono-Obla-led Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the
Recovery of Public Property insisted that Mark acquired the “national monument”
in clear breach of the monetisation policy of the Federal Government.
The
letter, signed by Obono-Obla and titled ‘Investigation activities: Notice to
recover public property in your care’, and addressed to Mark, stated in part,
“The extant Monetisation Policy of the Federal Government, as enunciated and
still being implemented, excludes all Principal Officers of the National
Assembly and hence places the responsibility on the Federal Government to
provide accommodation for them, same which you allegedly illegally
appropriated.”
The letter
asked Mark “to take steps within the next 21 days to vacate the said property
or show cause why the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria should not
enforce the recovery of the said property for public good.”
It added,
“You are further being notified pursuant to the Recovery Property (Special
Provisions) Act, 1983, to complete and return within 30 days the attached Form
B (Declaration of Assets Form) to the office of the undersigned.”
But Mark,
through his lawyer, Ken Ikonne, filed the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1037/2017
before the Federal High Court in Abuja, insisting that he legally acquired the
property through a “walk-in bid” at the behest of the FCTA.
He also
contended that the recovery process initiated by the Federal Government was
unconstitutional.
The
Attorney General of the Federation and Obono-Obla are joined as respondents to
the suit.
Among his
prayers, Mark sought “a declaration that the unilateral declaration by the
defendants that the plaintiff’s acquisition” of the property “is illegal and
the order compelling the plaintiff to vacate the aforesaid property” without
affording him “a hearing,” amounted to a denial of his “fundamental rights to
fair hearing and property, and are therefore unconstitutional and void.”
He also
sought a declaration that “the service by the defendants on the plaintiff of
the Notice to Declare His Assets (Form A) and the Assets Declaration Form B is
unconstitutional and thus void.”
He sought
“an order quashing” the defendants’ declaration of his acquisition of the
aforesaid property as illegal, and another order “quashing the order of the
defendants” compelling him to vacate the aforesaid property.”
He also
applied for an order of the court “quashing the Notice to Declare Assets Form A
and the Assets Declaration Form B” served on him and “a perpetual injunction
restraining the defendants, jointly and severally” or through any agent “from
evicting the plaintiff from the said property, or recovering same from him.”
Mark said
he was occupying the said property in 2010 when the FCTA, “citing security
concerns”, decided to construct new official residences for the leadership of
the National Assembly, including the President of the Senate, in a more secure
and conducive environment.”
According
to the former Senate President, the FCTA had insisted that the reserve price of
N673,200,000.00 reflected the open market value of the property.
He added
that the valuers of the FCT that inspected and carried out a valuation of the
property had put the “replacement cost” of the property at N492,700,000.
He said he
duly accepted the offer on April 21, 2011 and paid the “agreed purchase price
to the Ad hoc Committee on Sale of FGN Houses” on April 27, 2011.
He said
the house now served as his family home in Abuja.
But he
said surprisingly he was on October 9, 2017 served a letter of investigation
activities dated September 5, 2017, by the Okono-Obla-led panel.
He stated
in his suit that, “the defendants (AGF and Obono-Obla) unilaterally, and
without affording me any hearing at all, and without any order of any court,
declared my acquisition of the said property illegal, and ordered me to vacate
the said property failing which the defendants would enforce the recovery of
the property against me.”
EFCC grills Benue senator for seven hours, seizes
passport
Meanwhile,
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, on Monday, interrogated the
immediate past Senate President, David Mark, for seven hours, The Source has learnt.
Impeccable
sources within the EFCC told one of our correspondents that Mark’s passport was
also seized before he was allowed to go on an administrative bail.
The Source learnt that Mark, who served as Senate President from 2007
to 2015, arrived at the Abuja office of the EFCC around 12noon and was released
at 7pm.
The source
added, “The former Senate President arrived around 12pm and spent seven hours
responding to several questions from detectives.
“He was
released at 7pm on the condition that he must submit his passport to the
commission which he did.
“Senator
Mark is expected to return soon to answer more questions”
The former
Senate President is expected to account for over N5.4bn slush cash and campaign
funds allegedly traced to him.
He was
alleged to have received over N500m from the government of former President
Goodluck Jonathan during the build-up to the 2015 presidential election.
The money
is alleged to have been part of the $2.1bn meant for arms procurement.
The
Senator, who has been representing Benue-South Senatorial District since 1999,
is also accused of sharing N2.9bn to his colleagues while presiding over the
upper legislative chamber.
The former
Senate President has, however, denied all the allegations levelled against him.
In a
statement on Sunday, Mark said, “To set the records straight, Senator Mark was
invited by the EFCC via a letter addressed to the National Assembly to answer
questions on the 2015 presidential election campaign funds as it concerned
Benue State.
“As a law-abiding
citizen, Senator Mark honoured the invitation.
“Curiously,
they also alleged that the PDP paid over N2bn into the National Assembly’s
account which he, as then President of the Senate, allegedly shared among the
109 senators, including PDP, Action Congress of Nigeria and All Nigerian
Peoples Party (members) in 2010.
“Again, to
the best of his knowledge, Senator Mark is not aware of such transactions. This
simply did not make sense to any right thinking member of society.
“Senator
Mark wondered why anybody would think that PDP will pay money into National
Assembly account. He, however, clarified all the issues raised before returning
home.”
Comments
Post a Comment